Lizzo Dancers Push for Trial in Sex Harassment Case, Reject First Amendment Defense

Lizzo’s former backup dancers are urging a California appeals court to allow their high-profile sexual harassment lawsuit to proceed, arguing the singer’s free speech defense has no basis. Earlier this year, a Los Angeles judge ruled that while fat-shaming allegations would be dismissed, claims involving coercive behavior at sex shows in Amsterdam and Paris should go to trial.
In a new filing, attorney Ari Stiller argued there is no meaningful connection between the explicit outings and Lizzo’s artistic process, dismissing the idea that such events were “creative expression.” Stiller mocked the defense by suggesting that, under Lizzo’s interpretation, Johnny Cash could justify shooting “a man in Reno” if it might inspire his art. Lizzo’s lawyer, Melissa Glass, responded that the dancers’ claims remain uncorroborated and refuted by 18 sworn statements from tour personnel.
The lawsuit, originally filed in 2023, accuses Lizzo of sexual harassment and, in one instance, false imprisonment. If the appeals court sides with the dancers, the case will return for a full jury trial; if Lizzo prevails, the matter ends. A separate suit by wardrobe designer Asha Daniels, alleging racism and bullying on the Special tour, also remains pending against Lizzo’s touring company.










